From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15046: 24.3.50; Extra Line under minibuffer in Mac OSX fullscreen Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:51:55 +0300 Message-ID: <83haezrmys.fsf@gnu.org> References: <458E3DA2-8906-443F-9394-7F3E24DDABC5@gmail.com> <83pptnrwnr.fsf@gnu.org> <83mworrokf.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376056338 16803 80.91.229.3 (9 Aug 2013 13:52:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 13:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15046@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 09 15:52:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n74-0004jZ-T5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 15:52:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50342 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n74-0007m5-Ic for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:52:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37849) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n6u-0007dB-Ho for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:52:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n6o-0007k8-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n6o-0007jz-CO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n6n-0003sg-MJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15046.137605630714897 (code B ref 15046); Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2013 13:51:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49260 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n6Z-0003sC-6j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:34201) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7n6X-0003ru-8J for 15046@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:51:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MR900L00NQ4HH00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 15046@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:51:38 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MR900LJZNU2CN70@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:51:38 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:77159 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 15:30:24 +0200 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 15046@debbugs.gnu.org > > IMO, it is much better to give the leftover space to the main > window(s) than to the mini-window. The main reason I can think of now > is that the main window(s) is (are) more likely to have more text > beyond its last wholly-visible line than the mini-window (which > usually will not need more than one line). But OTOH the other windows are taller, so they have more lines than the poor little minibuffer window.