From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15478: cc-mode does not obey electric-indent-mode Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 19:05:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83hact5aoe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20131002200737.GA3895@acm.acm> <524CDA92.1030107@dancol.org> <20131003094543.GA3211@acm.acm> <83zjqn5cri.fsf@gnu.org> <20131007093859.GA3859@acm.acm> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381161980 19559 80.91.229.3 (7 Oct 2013 16:06:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org, josh@foxtail.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 07 18:06:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDK9-0005R8-Mg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:06:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60707 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDK9-0006tS-92 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:06:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDK1-0006tG-A4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:06:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDJw-00033W-6V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:06:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDJq-0002w0-I5; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDJq-0003y3-4D; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15478 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.138116194315224 (code B ref -1); Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2013 16:05:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60572 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDJW-0003xT-OA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:05:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57152) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDJT-0003xL-Vn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:05:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDJO-0002mP-Ap for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:05:39 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58832) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDJO-0002mL-7f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:05:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58835) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDJJ-0006ql-58 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:05:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDJC-0002ix-LK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:05:29 -0400 Original-Received: from moderators.individual.net ([130.133.4.7]:43658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTDJC-0002it-EX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:05:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.80.1) for gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1VTDJB-002YBr-QU>; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:05:22 +0200 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MUB00M0034FUG00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 19:05:10 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MUB00MQB3CLUF10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 19:05:10 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <20131007093859.GA3859@acm.acm> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:78986 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:39:00 +0000 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , > gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org > From: Alan Mackenzie > > Hi, Josh. > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 10:04:00PM -0700, Josh wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > From: Stefan Monnier > > > > Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 21:10:01 -0400 > > > > Cc: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org > > > > For people who don't like electric-indent-mode, CC-mode's > > > > c-electric-flag sucks just as much. > > > Who are they, except for you? Why don't we hear any complaints about > > > that, except from you? > > > c-electric-flag is a variable defined in `cc-engine.el'. > > Its value is t > > > Automatically becomes buffer-local when set. > > > Documentation: > > Not documented as a variable. > > > Do you hear many complaints about other undocumented variables? > > Here, the variable need only be accessed through the function below. The > emphasis on this variable is only in discussions like this one, not in > user facilities. Right. And in any case, I meant complaints about the behavior, not about the variables/functions that control it.