From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Small patch to emacsbug.el Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:16:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83h9yo2mr0.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1414513009 14914 80.91.229.3 (28 Oct 2014 16:16:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: peder@news.klingenberg.no (Peder O. Klingenberg) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 28 17:16:44 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj9Rq-0004t0-Ul for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:16:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40237 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj9Rq-0004yE-H5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj9Rh-0004wf-OX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj9Rc-0000dK-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:16:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:38207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj9Rb-0000cy-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:16:28 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NE500D00WVU5200@mtaout29.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:15:06 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NE5003C6X56OXA0@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:15:06 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.185 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175927 Archived-At: > From: peder@news.klingenberg.no (Peder O. Klingenberg) > Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:49:55 +0100 > > +;; It's the default mail mode, so it seems OK to use its features. > +(autoload 'message-bogus-recipient-p "message") > +(autoload 'message-make-address "message") > +(defvar message-send-mail-function) > +(defvar message-sendmail-envelope-from) What if the user overrides that default, and uses a different mail mode?