From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 05:50:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83h9qxxvo4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <83twv31jzg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> <83bnh7z8c5.fsf@gnu.org> <5564C2C7.5050909@yandex.ru> <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> <55650812.60909@yandex.ru> <831ti2yu1a.fsf@gnu.org> <5565E28A.5040507@yandex.ru> <83wpzuxbtd.fsf@gnu.org> <5565E8AB.5020107@yandex.ru> <83r3q2xa3q.fsf@gnu.org> <5566583F.7020503@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432781485 7585 80.91.229.3 (28 May 2015 02:51:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 02:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 28 04:51:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YxnuZ-0000dz-8o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 04:51:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56088 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxnuY-0001E1-D1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxnuW-0001Dw-4m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:51:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxnuS-0000bQ-3T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:51:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxnuS-0000bF-18 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:51:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YxnuR-0003Rt-0o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:51:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 02:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.143278143513220 (code B ref 20629); Thu, 28 May 2015 02:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2015 02:50:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58775 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxnty-0003R9-UD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:50:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:53700) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxntw-0003Qv-H7 for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:50:33 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NP100N00GUDK300@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:45:40 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NP100D2TH04IKA0@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:45:40 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <5566583F.7020503@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103247 Archived-At: > Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 02:50:23 +0300 > > On 05/27/2015 07:23 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Yes, but they look at different parts of the tag's record. > > We check every tag against both functions, that's the point. > tag-implicit-name-match-p is more flexible, > > > No, we match them with tag-exact-match-p, AFAICS. > > No. Unless there's an explicit tag name, this function will return nil. > Check out the first comment in its implementation. I _was_ talking about explicit tag names. > Anyway, this thread of thought is probably not worth pursuing: we'd want > to be compatible with 'ctags -e' (not least because it supports more > languages), and there's no option to generate qualified C++ method names > there. Exuberant ctags does have such an option: --extra=+q.