From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 29c360e: Ensure redisplay after "C-x C-e" Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 18:30:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83h9kzqedf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151106093011.17282.48378@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <83vb9fqjvr.fsf@gnu.org> <83si4jqh5b.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446827482 4929 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2015 16:31:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 06 17:31:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zujuv-0000an-W1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 17:31:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39818 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zujuv-0003U1-C5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:31:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zujus-0003Tu-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:31:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zujup-0006Xl-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:31:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:53562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zujup-0006Wp-8i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXE00200J2UXR00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 18:31:00 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXE00255J7OX410@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 18:31:00 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193455 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:11:43 +0000 > From: Artur Malabarba > Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel > > 2015-11-06 15:30 GMT+00:00 Eli Zaretskii : > >> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 14:53:01 +0000 > >> From: Artur Malabarba > >> Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel > >> > >> > "C-x C-e" > >> > >> C-x C-e is not the only way to evaluate arbitrary lisp code, there are > >> plenty of others (, > >> eval-expression, etc). > > > > Does any of them cause the problem I tried to fix? IOW, if any of > > these include the form (setq line-spacing 1.0), does evaluating it > > fail to redraw the selected window with the new line-spacing? > > eval-buffer, eval-region, and eval-defun all do (you have to invoke > them with keys, not with M-x). Thanks, I will think about a solution to at least some of these. But in any case, "C-x C-e" is frequently used to test the effect of a variable, so having at least that produce an immediate effect is IMO a Good Thing.