From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:16:44 +0200 Message-ID: <83h9ksjkxv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9kscqig.fsf@red-bean.com> <83vb98jqwp.fsf@gnu.org> <83pozgjnry.fsf@gnu.org> <83lha4jly2.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447276696 32599 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2015 21:18:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 22:18:05 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcmK-0002Rz-Iz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:18:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43035 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcmK-0001hz-TP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:18:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39239) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwcll-0001d6-0X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwclC-0005Au-Qy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:17:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:47817) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwclC-0005AE-Jj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:16:54 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXO00D005HYPU00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:15:46 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXO009405QAZP40@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:15:46 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194147 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:00:44 -0800 > > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > To me, nothing about electric-indent-mode is reasonable. I don't mind > > swapping C-m and C-j, if that's what will keep me sane. If > > electric-indent-mode did just that, perhaps I'd be fine with it. > > Out of interest, who has a passionate feeling that it should be the default? Sorry, I happily forgot.