From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: 64 bit official Windows builds Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:55:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83h9he8lkp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2577057e-98d3-41ce-ade2-1496648b09c3@googlegroups.com> <8337t3qdpd.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpqb7yzk.fsf@gnu.org> <8760xuuc3g.fsf@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455260172 15109 80.91.229.3 (12 Feb 2016 06:56:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 06:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 07:55:52 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aU7dw-0000Yo-Cx for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 07:55:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57863 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aU7dv-00047d-MZ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:55:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aU7dJ-0003eC-Cn for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:55:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aU7dF-00040a-Cr for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:55:13 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aU7dF-00040W-9Y; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:55:09 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1708 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aU7dE-0007Ft-EA; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:55:08 -0500 In-reply-to: <8760xuuc3g.fsf@wanadoo.es> (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3s?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?car?= Fuentes on Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:16:35 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:109124 Archived-At: > From: Óscar Fuentes > Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:16:35 +0100 > > > I measured that by running GNU Find compiled from the same sources on > > a large and deep directory tree on the same Windows 7 box. > > > > That thunking is the culprit is my theory, not a fact; however, I > > cannot find any other explanation. If someone does, I'm all ears. > > I mentioned some possibilities on a previous message. Did you use the > same toolset and libraries for the 32 and 64 bits build? No. The program was compiled by mingw.org's MinGW for 32 bits and by MinGW64 for 64 bits. > The MinGW and MinGW-w64 (32/64 bits) runtimes diverged quite a bit. GNU Find uses only msvcrt.dll, no other runtime libraries are involved in any significant way.