From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should we restore manually maintained ChangeLogs Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:08:45 +0200 Message-ID: <83h9gafjhu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56DE0F6A.6010207@cs.ucla.edu> <83pov5rmt6.fsf@gnu.org> <56DFD78F.40205@cs.ucla.edu> <56E06093.7050509@cs.ucla.edu> <83twkfo7ij.fsf@gnu.org> <20160309181005.GF3948@acm.fritz.box> <87vb4vuu59.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87pov3nrnm.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83mvq6n7xs.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1r2mzuy.fsf@gnu.org> <8360wumxj4.fsf@gnu.org> <831t7imqeg.fsf@gnu.org> <56E17325.5040503@gmail.com> <83vb4ula7g.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457885372 10067 80.91.229.3 (13 Mar 2016 16:09:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: evgeny.panasyuk@gmail.com, sven.axelsson@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "John Wiegley" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 13 17:09:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1af8a6-0002rU-7q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 17:09:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36676 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af8a5-00018F-Ha for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:09:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52348) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af8Zy-00017n-9T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:09:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af8Zx-0004dM-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:09:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af8Zw-0004d5-1j; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:09:16 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4234 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1af8Zv-0005yg-15; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:09:15 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:04:32 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201600 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: Sven Axelsson , evgeny.panasyuk@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 20:04:32 -0800 > > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > If using "git replace" to fix a mistake in a log message is as simple as > > saying "git replace --edit SHA1" followed by "git push", then perhaps > > someone would like to try this for a while in a test repository, and if that > > gives good results, we could start using that. > > I'll give it a try and see how well it fits with the other proposal I made > today. If 'git replace' is better/easier than maintaining our own separate > amendments file, then it sounds nice. Thanks.