From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Understanding a recent commit in emacs-25 branch [ed19f2] Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 21:56:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83h9fiplle.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56FE1882.9030904@cs.ucla.edu> <20160403120300.GB3537@acm.fritz.box> <8760vy6gfi.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <871t6m5zjq.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87wpoey1ij.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459709848 24598 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2016 18:57:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 18:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stromeko@nexgo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 03 20:57:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1amnD8-0005Y9-Lr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 20:57:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54833 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amnD8-0006fk-3e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 14:57:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amnD4-0006fe-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 14:57:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amnD0-0008SF-1d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 14:57:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amnCz-0008SB-UW; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 14:57:13 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3883 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1amnCz-0000dc-17; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 14:57:13 -0400 In-reply-to: <87wpoey1ij.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sun, 03 Apr 2016 20:45:40 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202647 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 20:45:40 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Achim Gratz writes: > > > I don't think so. For an upstream-tracking branch rebase=true should be > > the default. > > Rebase should never be the default, because it is more complicated and > harder to get right. It creates new commits that each must be retested. Agreed.