From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sendmail.el Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:42:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83h9a6d5ed.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472283758 4437 195.159.176.226 (27 Aug 2016 07:42:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 07:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 27 09:42:34 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bdYGA-0000jE-0F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:42:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35043 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdYG7-0005Su-Iq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdYG1-0005Sd-Bu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdYFv-00019p-CX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdYFv-00019l-9N; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:42:19 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4936 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bdYFn-0003N4-2G; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:42:11 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:04:55 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206827 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:04:55 -0400 > Cc: Emacs developers > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > > I think the problem is simply that old-point is the wrong place for > > point to remain at. It needs to go back where it was in the search > > loop, but old-point is where it was on entry to the function. > > Yes, after looking more at the surrounding code, I concur. Please push, and thanks.