From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: status of emacs-25 branch Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 07:04:31 +0300 Message-ID: <83h90do7u8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mvalc483.fsf@gnu.org> <83fugdbfzj.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvakppt2.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83r2zwa759.fsf@gnu.org> <83shjynqmz.fsf@gnu.org> <87efvi9c8d.fsf@petton.fr> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495425958 30624 195.159.176.226 (22 May 2017 04:05:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 04:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, rgm@gnu.org To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 22 06:05:51 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dCebO-0007nd-UC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 May 2017 06:05:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40284 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCebU-0002I7-B9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 May 2017 00:05:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36893) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCebL-0002I0-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2017 00:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCebH-00034g-J4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2017 00:05:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53353) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCeaO-0002kF-2h; Mon, 22 May 2017 00:04:48 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4259 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dCeaK-0000Wb-UO; Mon, 22 May 2017 00:04:45 -0400 In-reply-to: <87efvi9c8d.fsf@petton.fr> (message from Nicolas Petton on Sun, 21 May 2017 22:38:42 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215080 Archived-At: > From: Nicolas Petton > Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk > Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 22:38:42 +0200 > > I can make a release if you want Thanks. Let's see first what people think about this. > (I guess we'll need to go through a few release candidates?). No, the plan is just one release tarball. Nothing's changed on the release branch since 25.2, except a couple of documentation changes, and whatever we decide to do to fix bug#26952.