From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li>
Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: git-handler.el
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 20:43:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83h8xcisvd.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a834d7ew.fsf@bernoul.li> (message from Jonas Bernoulli on Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:26:15 +0200)
> From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li>
> Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru
> Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 19:26:15 +0200
>
> >> > A revisioned filename is something like "/path/to/file@@revision".
> >> > "revision" could be a revision like "81656add81", a branch like
> >> > "scratch/kqueue", or a tag like "emacs-19.34". Of course, the syntax
> >> > could be changed.
> >>
> >> I would prefer /path/to/repo/@git:REVISION:path/to/file. I don't have
> >> a strong opinion about what the magic cookie should look like, but I
> >> think it should be inserted at the root of the working tree.
> >
> > That doesn't scale to VCSes which keep separate versions for
> > individual files.
>
> How so? Wouldn't my scheme just look like:
>
> /path/to/dir-containing-closest-control-file/<vcs>@<rev>:<file>
>
> instead of
>
> /path/to/dir-containing-closest-control-file/<vcs>@<file>/<rev>
>
> when trying to stay as close the internals of that <vcs>?
Well, for starters, it will defeat the completion machinery, or at
least make it much more complicated.
> Also isn't that an implementation detail and users of <vcs> still
> think of "/path/to/top" as "the repository"? If that is so then
> what should it matter that <vcs> spreads the history files across
> the repository instead of putting them into a dedicated control
> directory?
FILE@@revision is not a history file, it is FILE as it looked like at
given VERSION. Where that information is kept is beside the point.
As I'm sure you understand, so I guess I don't really see the point
you are making here.
> > Michael's scheme does support such VCSes. For a
> > VCS like Git or Bazaar, Michael's scheme shouldn't get in the way, I
> > think.
>
> Maybe we could use different schemes for different vc systems.
That would be undesirable, I think.
> The revision is part of a virtual directory structure
Sorry, you lost me. What is that "virtual directory structure", and
how is it relevant to this issue?
> This is one way of accessing <blob> as stored in <branch>:
We are talking about abstractions, not about their Git implementation.
So why do we have to consider blobs?
> One example use case where the scheme that I propose would be nicer than
> the non-hierarchic one is "using find-file to open another blob from the
> same revision/tree".
I guess I'm so Git-ignorant that I don't even understand what that
means. Maybe I shouldn't be part of this discussion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-12 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-05 15:29 In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit (was: comparing code on different branches) John Yates
2017-07-05 16:15 ` Kaushal Modi
2017-07-05 16:22 ` In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit Óscar Fuentes
2017-07-05 16:27 ` Kaushal Modi
2017-07-05 16:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-07-05 18:15 ` Óscar Fuentes
2017-07-05 23:03 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-06 0:24 ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2017-07-06 1:46 ` Glenn Morris
2017-07-06 2:17 ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2017-07-10 9:26 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-06 2:29 ` Jean-Christophe Helary
2017-07-14 14:34 ` Philippe Vaucher
2017-07-16 1:51 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-06 1:50 ` Glenn Morris
2017-07-06 14:12 ` Ted Zlatanov
2017-07-06 14:47 ` Kaushal Modi
2017-07-06 17:11 ` Óscar Fuentes
2017-07-06 16:02 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-06 16:52 ` Ken Manheimer
2017-07-07 18:23 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-07 18:49 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-07-07 22:08 ` Phillip Lord
2017-07-07 22:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-07-08 6:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-08 6:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-08 9:05 ` Phillip Lord
2017-07-08 10:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-08 20:34 ` Phillip Lord
2017-07-09 2:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-10 9:28 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-10 13:15 ` Phillip Lord
2017-07-11 11:45 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-08 17:04 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-08 20:52 ` Phillip Lord
2017-07-10 9:30 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-08 17:02 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-10 9:26 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-10 12:47 ` Phillip Lord
2017-07-10 23:26 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-11 9:40 ` Phillip Lord
2017-07-11 22:56 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-10 23:27 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-10 16:31 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-07-10 23:30 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-11 4:20 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-07-11 11:48 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-06 23:01 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-07-07 18:27 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-07 18:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-07-08 17:01 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-08 17:42 ` raman
2017-07-08 18:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-08 20:57 ` Phillip Lord
2017-07-08 22:57 ` John Yates
2017-07-09 0:04 ` raman
2017-07-09 9:25 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-07-09 14:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-10 1:01 ` In defense of VC [was: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit] Juliusz Chroboczek
2017-07-10 7:09 ` Michael Albinus
2017-07-10 8:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2017-07-10 8:47 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2017-07-10 8:59 ` Yuri Khan
2017-07-10 16:28 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-07-10 17:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-16 18:01 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-07-16 19:09 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-07-16 19:17 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-07-10 23:26 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-11 4:15 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-07-11 11:48 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-11 14:10 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-07-11 14:27 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2017-07-11 22:56 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-11 14:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-11 16:03 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-07-11 7:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-07-11 7:26 ` Michael Albinus
2017-07-11 22:55 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-10 9:29 ` In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit Richard Stallman
2017-07-10 16:32 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-07-10 23:30 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-11 4:14 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-07-06 15:24 ` Phillip Lord
2017-07-10 9:26 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-10 13:09 ` Phillip Lord
2017-07-11 11:45 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-05 16:29 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-07-05 18:37 ` Ingo Lohmar
2017-07-05 18:14 ` In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit (was: comparing code on different branches) Noam Postavsky
2017-07-06 5:06 ` Paul Michael Reilly
2017-07-06 8:46 ` In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit Toon Claes
2017-07-07 1:38 ` Mike Gerwitz
2017-07-07 8:16 ` Trying out GitLab (was Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit) Nicolas Petton
2017-07-07 8:27 ` Tino Calancha
2017-07-07 8:29 ` Nicolas Petton
2017-07-07 12:08 ` Ted Zlatanov
2017-07-08 11:02 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-07-08 11:13 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-07-08 11:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-08 12:04 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-07-08 21:02 ` Phillip Lord
2017-07-08 23:19 ` Tim Cross
2017-07-08 12:43 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-07-08 12:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-08 11:29 ` Jean-Christophe Helary
2017-07-07 16:55 ` Mike Gerwitz
2017-07-07 18:23 ` In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit Richard Stallman
2017-07-07 18:23 ` In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit (was: comparing code on different branches) Richard Stallman
2017-07-13 16:13 ` Jonas Bernoulli
2017-07-14 1:20 ` Richard Stallman
2017-07-14 18:24 ` Jonas Bernoulli
2017-07-14 3:31 ` In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit Stefan Monnier
2017-07-14 18:09 ` Jonas Bernoulli
2017-07-14 7:14 ` git-handler.el (was: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit) Michael Albinus
2017-07-14 17:57 ` Jonas Bernoulli
2017-08-11 10:26 ` git-handler.el Michael Albinus
2017-08-12 10:48 ` git-handler.el Jonas Bernoulli
2017-08-12 12:01 ` git-handler.el Eli Zaretskii
2017-08-12 17:26 ` git-handler.el Jonas Bernoulli
2017-08-12 17:43 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2017-08-12 19:32 ` git-handler.el Michael Albinus
2017-08-12 18:22 ` git-handler.el John Wiegley
2017-08-12 18:28 ` git-handler.el Michael Albinus
2017-08-12 19:52 ` git-handler.el Jonas Bernoulli
2017-08-13 9:26 ` git-handler.el Michael Albinus
2017-08-12 19:17 ` git-handler.el Michael Albinus
2017-08-12 19:46 ` git-handler.el Yuri Khan
2017-08-13 9:14 ` git-handler.el Michael Albinus
2017-08-13 10:08 ` git-handler.el Yuri Khan
2017-08-13 14:31 ` git-handler.el Eli Zaretskii
2017-08-13 15:08 ` git-handler.el Yuri Khan
2017-08-13 15:26 ` git-handler.el Eli Zaretskii
2017-08-14 16:42 ` git-handler.el Michael Albinus
2017-08-14 16:40 ` git-handler.el Michael Albinus
2017-07-10 16:16 ` In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit (was: comparing code on different branches) Filipe Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83h8xcisvd.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jonas@bernoul.li \
--cc=michael.albinus@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.