From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 05:39:22 +0200
Message-ID: <83h8sqqaz9.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87zikiwpl6.fsf@igalia.com> <87fum7o0qu.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87zikfmiiy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878tq0dqgw.fsf@gnus.org>
	<87sho1gemz.fsf@gnu.org> <87vasigi2c.fsf@igalia.com>
	<871sv2krfc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8360d1yzvj.fsf@gnu.org>
	<877exbhbc5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k21bj7sb.fsf@detlef>
	<87y3phgf3a.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k210mr8l.fsf@gnu.org>
	<83374t117z.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7yra2bz.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<83o9n7t669.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1xu90eg.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<83indeu0xn.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi6p71dd.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<83y3m9s27e.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1xo39pu.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<CAArVCkRH8ffWF1MY_c6zyiXqNs-mmdHn0vZ1eqXPgYB7ADoLJg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87d13el010.fsf@lifelogs.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513481959 509 195.159.176.226 (17 Dec 2017 03:39:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 03:39:19 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: wingo@igalia.com, 25061@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org,
	p.stephani2@gmail.com, michael.albinus@gmx.de, larsi@gnus.org
To: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 17 04:39:14 2017
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1eQPnE-00087I-CS
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 04:39:12 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52974 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1eQPpC-0002vh-IM
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:41:14 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51824)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eQPp3-0002vO-EP
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:41:09 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eQPoz-0005KK-VX
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:41:05 -0500
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57496)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eQPoz-0005KC-Ra
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:41:01 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eQPoz-0003Mn-LA
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:41:01 -0500
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 03:41:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.25061.B25061.151348200712871@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25061
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
Original-Received: via spool by 25061-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25061.151348200712871
	(code B ref 25061); Sun, 17 Dec 2017 03:41:01 +0000
Original-Received: (at 25061) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2017 03:40:07 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37944 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eQPo1-0003LI-Nd
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:40:06 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60646)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1eQPnx-0003Ks-Ek
	for 25061@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:40:00 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1eQPno-0004CD-HP
	for 25061@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:39:52 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43045)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1eQPnL-0003Wh-6W; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:39:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4004 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1eQPnK-0001PG-CI; Sat, 16 Dec 2017 22:39:18 -0500
In-reply-to: <87d13el010.fsf@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Sat, 
	16 Dec 2017 18:34:51 -0500)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs"
	<bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:141197
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/141197>

> From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 18:34:51 -0500
> Cc: wingo@igalia.com, 25061@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org,
> 	michael.albinus@gmx.de, larsi@gnus.org
> 
> Considering 14.04 is pretty old, and AFAIK we can't check if %DUMBFW is
> supported, we don't have good options:
> 
> 1) undo the change (please don't just revert the commit)
> 2) document the breakage
> 3) start setting the default conditionally based on GnuTLS version (ugh)
> 
> Any other options?

If no other ideas come up, I don't see 3) as such a terrible choice.

Thanks.