From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36216: 27.0.50; Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpld-size during bootstrap Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 17:20:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83h88pvcgr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83o92zwed9.fsf@gnu.org> <83blyzw3zs.fsf@gnu.org> <83k1dlvd6x.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="233541"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36216@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero , Stefan Monnier , John Wiegley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 16 16:22:00 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW2h-000ySi-Qd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:21:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40214 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW2g-0008Cr-75 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:21:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW2R-0008CP-34 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:21:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW1n-0004xF-M2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55907) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW1n-0004wz-HR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW1n-0000Cl-CT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:21:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 14:21:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36216 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36216-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36216.1560694824726 (code B ref 36216); Sun, 16 Jun 2019 14:21:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36216) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2019 14:20:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41218 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW1A-0000Be-B6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:20:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53388) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW15-0000BM-JE for 36216@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:20:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW10-0004L8-04; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:20:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2219 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hcW0y-0008E9-5U; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:20:13 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:17:33 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:160670 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:17:33 +0200 > Cc: 36216@debbugs.gnu.org > > > But maybe we simply should bump the default value of that variable? > > That's certainly OK to me. Any objections to bumping max-specpld-size from 1300 to 1500?