From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36850: 26.2; Customizing nnmail-expiry-wait-function doesn't work Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 17:27:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83h86zfxsb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8036io5cx5.fsf@felesatra.moe> <87v9vfzpcr.fsf@tcd.ie> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="113462"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36850@debbugs.gnu.org, darkfeline@felesatra.moe To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 02 16:28:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htYXR-000TKv-F2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:28:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35290 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htYXQ-0002Uy-67 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htYXL-0002Uq-0h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htYXK-0001yh-3k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htYXK-0001yX-0I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htYXJ-0001sE-O7; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:28:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 14:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36850 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 36850-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36850.15647560347136 (code B ref 36850); Fri, 02 Aug 2019 14:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36850) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2019 14:27:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htYWY-0001r2-Cn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:27:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52913) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htYWW-0001qm-Oj for 36850@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:27:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htYWR-0001RO-GX; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3004 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1htYWP-00034s-Oa; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:27:06 -0400 In-reply-to: <87v9vfzpcr.fsf@tcd.ie> (contovob@tcd.ie) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164356 Archived-At: > From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" > Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:08:52 +0300 > Cc: 36850@debbugs.gnu.org > > While looking at this, I noticed some room for clarification in the > relevant docs. Are the following clarifications welcome and suitable > for emacs-26? It's fine with me to push this to the emacs-26 branch, but I'd like Lars or someone else from the Gnus camp to eyeball the changes first. Thanks.