From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tabs Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 22:03:06 +0300 Message-ID: <83h84l1ytx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a7bpysm8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875zlnu9ds.fsf@web.de> <87blvdxpr0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878sqhtbm3.fsf@web.de> <87v9tgnndn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h84npa5e.fsf@web.de> <87imp2vns4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a7aeth9c.fsf@web.de> <874l0mhy85.fsf@web.de> <834l0l3gsh.fsf@gnu.org> <875zl1pxm4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87o8ytpvlt.fsf@web.de> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="84106"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 06 21:03:39 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBog-000LgB-Vn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 21:03:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36418 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBof-0007t5-E6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 15:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBoT-0007pt-FF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 15:03:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34173) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBoT-0001yb-3c; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 15:03:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3313 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBoQ-0006mf-1G; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 15:03:24 -0400 In-reply-to: <87o8ytpvlt.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Sun, 06 Oct 2019 20:38:54 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240664 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 20:38:54 +0200 > > > /* On some platforms (at least MS-Windows), the > > scroll_run_hook called from scrolling_window > > called from update_frame could set the frame's > > garbaged flag, in which case we need to > > redisplay the frame. */ > > if (FRAME_GARBAGED_P (f)) > > goto retry_frame; > > Thanks. Seems Eli changed this in > > 2fa9699fd7 Fix display of cursor in obscure use case on MS-Windows That change is not a bug: we cannot possible leave the frame garbaged when we end a redisplay cycle. Some other factor is at work here, and it sounds like I need all the help you can provide to understand what that is, because it doesn't seem to happen to me. TIA