From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38561: 27.0.50; Feature request: expose buffer size setting for process filters Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 20:25:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83h81tzgca.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83woaqysf2.fsf@gnu.org> <83mublzi2e.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="245871"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 38561@debbugs.gnu.org To: yyoncho@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 21 19:26:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iijS6-0011pa-Ts for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 19:26:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41470 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iijS5-0006DZ-Dk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:26:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44215) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iijRz-0006DT-1T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iijRy-0000FH-0j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iijRx-0000EY-R5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:26:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iijRx-0000no-N2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:26:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38561 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38561-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38561.15769527533070 (code B ref 38561); Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2019 18:25:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48769 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iijRo-0000nS-Qy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:25:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33713) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iijRn-0000nF-4h for 38561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:25:51 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:32831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iijRh-0007n5-Ud; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:25:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2490 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iijRU-0004hd-4C; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 13:25:45 -0500 In-reply-to: <83mublzi2e.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 21 Dec 2019 19:47:53 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:173609 Archived-At: > > 1. Document it in lsp-mode's readme > > 2. Override it with a setting in lsp-mode with a bigger value. > > > > Both have clear advantages and disadvantages. Can you advise? > > I'd suggest the former, because if lsp-mode sets the value, it will > affect the entire Emacs session. > > If lsp-mode uses accept-process-output, it could bind the variable > inside the form which calls accept-process-output. Btw, my assumption was that the value will have to be changed from default only in very rare situations. If this is not the case, we might indeed want that to be a parameter at process creation time (I don't think we have process-local variables, do we?).