From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-tree-sitter and Emacs Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 19:10:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7y1yikx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83eeta3sa0.fsf@gnu.org> <86369ojbig.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83lfnfz6jr.fsf@gnu.org> <864ku3htmb.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83v9mix9vk.fsf@gnu.org> <87pncq55f8.fsf@md5i.com> <83imihyl42.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="123288"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mwd@md5i.com, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Welsh Duggan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 02 18:11:19 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jK2R4-000Vx2-5b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 18:11:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44226 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jK2R3-00005J-7Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 12:11:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jK2QW-00080r-Bn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 12:10:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jK2QS-0004s6-Fy; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 12:10:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4574 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jK2QR-0000LS-Uc; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 12:10:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Michael Welsh Duggan on Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:24:33 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246271 Archived-At: > From: Michael Welsh Duggan > Cc: Michael Welsh Duggan , , > > Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:24:33 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Each buffer always knows which part of it remains unchanged. When > > fontification is invoked, it should start from that place. So there's > > no need to parse _all_ prior context. > > Why not? Won't it miss that hypothetical opening comment delimiter, for > example? No, because that was already taken care of when that comment delimiter was inserted.