From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43389: 28.0.50; Emacs memory leaks Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:01:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83h7pmpmr7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ft57raog.fsf@gnu.org> <871rgrk9g5.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <83d00br9xk.fsf@gnu.org> <87tutnitta.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <83a6vfr8p0.fsf@gnu.org> <4c760dd6-edb7-c6b1-f5de-f1bcae5ce63d@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4199"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, 43389@debbugs.gnu.org, dj@redhat.com To: Carlos O'Donell Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 18 19:13:20 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRxH-0000zj-Rl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:13:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46252 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRxG-0002Bl-So for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:13:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRnN-00039t-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:03:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53118) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRnK-0008Er-HZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:03:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRnK-0004wU-Dh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43389 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43389-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43389.160572252818934 (code B ref 43389); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 18:02:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36429 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRmR-0004vJ-Qb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:02:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRmQ-0004uq-6V for 43389@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRmI-00088T-Vi; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:02:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2617 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRm9-0005Nr-LW; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:01:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4c760dd6-edb7-c6b1-f5de-f1bcae5ce63d@redhat.com> (message from Carlos O'Donell on Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:43:55 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193639 Archived-At: > Cc: dj@redhat.com, 43389@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Carlos O'Donell > Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:43:55 -0500 > > >> (let ((size 0)) > >> (dolist (buffer (buffer-list) size) > >> (setq size (+ size (buffer-size buffer))))) > >> ⇒ 98249826 > >> > >> So it's not a small number, but still far away from those 800 MiB. > > > > Yes. I have a very similar value: 94642916 (in 376 buffers; you have > > more than 1000). This is in a session that runs for 17 days and whose > > VM size is 615 MB: a "normal" size for a long-living session, nowhere > > near 2GB, let alone 11GB someone reported. > > If you get us a data trace I will run it through the simulator and produce > a report that includes graphs explaining the results of the trace and > we'll see if a smoking gun shows up. If you asked Florian, then I agree that his data could be useful. If you were asking me, then my data is not useful, because the footprint is reasonable and never goes up to gigabyte range.