From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:02:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83h7m84h9g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <865z3866my.fsf@gmail.com> <865z38a9vo.fsf@gmail.com> <86eehujcip.fsf@gmail.com> <86blch14qt.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10467"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 09:11:05 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lD0sT-0002cq-FI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:11:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45522 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD0sS-0007ue-GP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:11:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD0kg-0000Yh-Ku for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37116) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD0kg-0004qZ-7x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lD0kg-0007uX-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46256.161372174830361 (code B ref 46256); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2021 08:02:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lD0k8-0007td-L3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:02:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35438) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lD0k7-0007tR-MD for 46256@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:02:27 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD0k1-0004Zy-RJ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:02:21 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1370 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lD0k0-0002Fv-Ph; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:02:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200308 Archived-At: > Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:00:29 +0000 > From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > >> Last queston: do reverse slashes '\' appear somewhere in those > >> filenames? This was issue I tried to fix with the blind patch I've > >> sent. > > > > As Eli pointed out, that is not the problem: forward slashes are ok. > > I understand they are handled, but here as we do a substitution we must > substitute what's coming in. > > As you have the possibility to debug this piece of code on Windows > please have a look at this (or try my blind patch if you haven't). If the problem is with hashing file names, you will have to canonicalize them first, including resolving the letter-case issue, the forward/back-slashes issue, and also the issue with those pesky numerical tails Windows sometimes produces. We have a function Fw32_long_file_name for that purpose, I think you should use it (if you need it for C strings, we could add a wrapper around w32_get_long_filename to do that instead). This assumes that you are talking about existing files; if that assumption is not true, we will need a slightly different strategy.