From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50285: 28.0.50; Mew dosen't work correctly if .el files of Mew are native compiled Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:05:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7f5u8ed.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210831.053846.366902917792575747.yasu@utahime.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28992"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: yasu@utahime.org, 50285@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 31 14:06:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mL2Wz-0007MA-Tb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 14:06:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45744 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL2Wy-0008Qm-Ui for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:06:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL2Wi-0008N5-25 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:06:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL2Wg-0008Ck-QA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mL2Wg-0008DB-KE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 12:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50285 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50285-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50285.163041152731524 (code B ref 50285); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 12:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50285) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2021 12:05:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mL2W7-0008CO-CO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:05:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41264) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mL2W5-0008CB-UV for 50285@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:05:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL2W0-0007jZ-Io; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:05:20 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3336 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL2W0-0005zE-24; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:05:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213093 Archived-At: > Cc: 50285@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:02:08 -0400 > From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > So we really have 3 problems here: > > 1- The code in Mew should not rely on the makefile rule for > correct compilation. > Fixing this would also make it easier to distribute Mew via ELPA > (where a similar problem shows up since package.el will compile the > .el files in an unspecified order which could thus result in the > same kind of miscompilation). > > 2- The generation of the `.eln` file should start from the `.elc` file > rather than from the `.el` file because we sometimes lack the > information needed to correctly re-generate the `.elc` file from the > `.el` file. And 3?...