From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 15:33:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7f1yh1q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83y28mp0rb.fsf@gnu.org> <51a363db-fde7-791d-cf8d-98ac601d62ee@yandex.ru> <57ca4d78-2339-201d-edce-678c9b003a99@yandex.ru> <83bl5dsh8b.fsf@gnu.org> <8335qps8vs.fsf@gnu.org> <9471c28f-8eae-b555-ee86-9fffd6229937@yandex.ru> <83bl5ayyym.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgsu428b.fsf@gnus.org> <369cfa83-fb3d-d452-94b1-64dbd6dc0253@yandex.ru> <87czppyl2m.fsf@gnus.org> <8f2dc384-92fd-cf70-a291-3295c9e8b176@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20240"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, danflscr@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, john@yates-sheets.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 03 14:39:52 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mM8U3-00053u-Ld for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 14:39:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37838 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mM8U2-0003Pg-Dl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:39:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mM8OR-0003dY-7X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mM8OQ-0003yt-Qj; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1754 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mM8OI-0001Mi-Tz; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:33:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8f2dc384-92fd-cf70-a291-3295c9e8b176@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:14:20 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273788 Archived-At: > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , "Philip K." , > Daniel Fleischer , Richard Stallman , > emacs-devel , Stefan Monnier > , Eli Zaretskii , > John Yates > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:14:20 +0300 > > On 03.09.2021 15:11, João Távora wrote: > > - default, the default > > - space-hippie, or space-pinhead, a reference to spacemacs and to Emacs' > > hidden 70s origins > > - doctor-doom, likewise for doom emacs, couldn't find anything > > particularly clever here, sorry. > > > > The idea are that the latter two are reasonably familiar to people > > migrating from those distributions. Not sure about vi kebinds though, ugh... > > That's a little silly: people don't usually migrate off those > distributions to vanilla. Or those that do, can already choose the > settings they want to carry over. I'm not sure this is a silly idea: I see on Reddit people saying they'd like switch from some distro to vanilla Emacs. When they do so, they could appreciate starting from something that's close to what they are familiar with. In any case, only offering such profiles could tell whether they are useful or not. > Spacemacs and Doom don't differ that much between themselves either, not > in basic behaviors. Then maybe we need just one profile, not 2.