From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#53452: 29.0.50;
 C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:45:09 +0200
Message-ID: <83h79shtm2.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20220122182635.hi7i2alow4ishyz5.ref@Ergus>
 <20220122182635.hi7i2alow4ishyz5@Ergus> <834k5vmvf0.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87czkhjtes.fsf@gmail.com> <83wnipjohu.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87pmohi818.fsf@gmail.com> <83r18xjlrj.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87czkgi0cq.fsf@gmail.com> <83mtjkhubf.fsf@gnu.org> <878rv4htza.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="14988"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: spacibba@aol.com, 53452@debbugs.gnu.org
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 25 15:27:59 2022
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1nCMnf-0003ir-1b
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:27:59 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33160 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1nCMne-000339-1E
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:27:58 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35376)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1nCLD0-0002aM-JC
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:46:07 -0500
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54371)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1nCLD0-00083I-A9
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:46:02 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1nCLD0-0004YU-9t
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:46:02 -0500
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:46:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.53452.B53452.164311472815196@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53452
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
Original-Received: via spool by 53452-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53452.164311472815196
 (code B ref 53452); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:46:02 +0000
Original-Received: (at 53452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2022 12:45:28 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47274 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1nCLCR-0003we-Ec
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:45:27 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34454)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1nCLCP-0003pF-HQ
 for 53452@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:45:25 -0500
Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=33456 helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1nCLCJ-0007vk-Qj; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:45:20 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=Eew4PTIqgNNLE7ibadW4AlU9TUEIUcKFDmcYiA1wYWU=; b=C/zUs0sCkUk1v3RzMUqC
 dVQoSpDHjmP0UV2P0UuCmPD7CdEZobByyISTavusqYCi2+OIuypuaKLg0y7CAa8xo+ajoYV0C+bRy
 2VAc3CVIeMZfKWBnbiwoG/LAZvXVyx8wbdQDSkD1cqTSxTnbf3lfJlNSl6eN5Ze9sN4DOEujtBSQE
 XAjJQkyq0IeyIFaCi+H18DS4pD8XmQT5zrHr62D/8vcU2Kx56JotfJnyZva2PaeGn+xOs+PNYzbVE
 ECkeHC9hbPWqmmeZ25VrgYCQBl+9YoWgEiGIRRV5y5PwDhfVdMZcKStibXTiB+9LZ436Vw0Oq+Y/7
 gXcLrtvez3j13A==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2084 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1nCLCJ-0002tE-9x; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:45:19 -0500
In-Reply-To: <878rv4htza.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Tue, 25
 Jan 2022 13:37:13 +0100)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
 the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs"
 <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225174
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/225174>

> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: spacibba@aol.com,  53452@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:37:13 +0100
> 
> >>>>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:29:56 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
> 
>     >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
>     >> So either we fix the behaviour, or the documentation. Would it be that
>     >> hard to restrict this to something like [a-z] or !function key? Or we
>     >> could always add yet-another-user-option.
> 
>     Eli> My point was that the behavior is probably okay, and the documentation
>     Eli> should be amended if it could confuse.
> 
> Itʼs only ok if weʼre ok with shift-selection being broken by it. Are
> we?

Like I said: I don't see how shift-selection could NOT be broken by
disabling shift-translation, because it DEPENDS on it.