From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: What does the error "Process not running" mean? Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 15:06:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83h799wlqs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6Ox0QxOSiVddeNsCaACeldkV9F-Nh9dM-rRERWveYqhG8t126cIm2MGmadX7Uy8YL-IQX9-Y=5F=5FZjAwEKArVB5v81UoZWZ7U4=5F1R70ywhZZY=3D@protonmail.com> <8jy--UTf4wNbxysxHArjzE3ADfF5mB=5FZsfnFd7sgKpf=5FGM=5F9O5YqVK1PH1QbnoizHbb6HonK-BeQEQx0OpCmSRnMSpJzNTcHHXASGOoiD9I=3D@protonmail.com> <87pmny8nb4.fsf@gnu.org> <=5FcUGEWwwd0FeA1-yUQ5OJfKvG6Y2m4lFHC0m42EOzULv02BYrQMv6BYH-YMsVim1q3G8b3ZNnmPMGB0ZgQP7=5F2Ib5vLqAHln3bVDUOqT3eU=3D@protonmail.com> <87pmnx63uy.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36853"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 08 15:37:38 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nHRcg-0009PC-Hp for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 15:37:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHRce-0001Oq-Rf for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 09:37:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHQDA-0001tz-Nd for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 08:07:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=56656 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHQDA-0000Gy-Dw for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 08:07:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=3SLwevVa/ipW7kqUfFRbb9nKnl/ft8C2r0V15EVlBaw=; b=aQLlARwTSMhNpt0BThir YVVI/u+lRIItE1mshW/QqXin2TslYPKuGFjZ+YGDc3+lwYINo5bTj6LFHrvY/chx8zygnx53qDJox 95K9Uq4YaaF0Bp9NLqw54NnPKGTbx/elb4KlbnoggWn8J0dOuoORJwSSHYJ6xmrTlZ5ziZ7EzziEt 0OOMrFPp1tnls5V9+7mwUTMjqSIyqvPv6o3sZUvA1ydIUBb6Cvx+u7carwj1d9pcQjIvkfrBNGvug bI3ROetp3XTi5V9+SJgMUWEhSJ3W6vxUbZeZ/yvt1KoRTjM19KjgySye2cfkaAI1aH0zI5wJyhaXM 8L4Rkfb2XiVGJA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2341 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHQCy-0006Yy-Ns for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 08:07:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pmnx63uy.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Tue, 08 Feb 2022 11:37:41 +0100) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:135830 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes > Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 11:37:41 +0100 > Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Tassilo Horn > > >>>>> On Tue, 08 Feb 2022 07:10:48 +0000, emacsq said: > > >> But the problem is present, so there must be some low limit in > >> emacs' windows code or elsewhere which prevent fetching urls in > >> parallel without errors. > > emacsq> I wrote a simple python script which fetched all the urls in > emacsq> parallel, in a separate thread each without any waiting, so that's > emacsq> dozens of urls at the same time and I did not get any "too many" > emacsq> errors. > > emacsq> So this suggests this too many sockets error is related to > emacsq> emacs somehow. > > Didnʼt Eli already explain this? Emacs on windows has a limit of 32 > simultaneous sub-processes, and a network connection counts as a > sub-process. Indeed. But given the amount of noise in this (and similar) threads, I'm not surprised that people miss important information and keep asking questions that were long answered.