From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Redisplay hook error bactraces [Was: Fontification error
 backtrace]
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 22:24:34 +0300
Message-ID: <83h73kvmrx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <Yrcw+Kaq1P4WS8x1@ACM> <83sfnsadow.fsf@gnu.org>
 <Yrdl7R0suxRpZTPJ@ACM> <83o7yg9f0w.fsf@gnu.org> <YroJnaBT4RR2SZ9t@ACM>
 <83r1396lvr.fsf@gnu.org> <Yrs6RpFUPNxazxKp@ACM>
 <83edz87ivz.fsf@gnu.org> <YrtXL0QKPWqv7mYB@ACM>
 <83r1375m6x.fsf@gnu.org> <Ys3QIdoEqrFXMCKj@ACM>
 <jwvfsj4al3c.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="37483"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: acm@muc.de, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 13 21:26:04 2022
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1oBhzm-0009Sy-8h
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 21:26:02 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60860 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1oBhzk-0007l9-Oi
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:26:00 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51898)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1oBhyW-0006oJ-QR
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:24:44 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55876)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1oBhyV-0003FE-S1; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:24:43 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=h/kL5bupPTpOTZGrFEDrd4n80hhV+GS+8oPVmk5g3Fk=; b=TTZIVvp9N0um
 4lj0c6iClSyHvwvCECLD+gyU9P9ZC9pzQfBmsoezRqGyEGmgSiHMlWOAcpXeH3Hb24quAM+7KRM/Z
 c2ks7mbfesfvA3xqd2QP8YAQEPbWGwfvzI7+5YV6beG+9V5fFUDQwk3nHtqhTsDjCUd7eyHvzKARx
 6JYNEk910eO+Q4lyWXfxk6RFOgOEBlnAgEgDEPU2fMgT36l5NyE29pperOxrJ0P20Ms0qcv135fLM
 fAvo9pUw0waQPOsxC26oGnzI2JRwqDj/kkryAnnH7eUYJhKkTRa9oIIUiRuX+Ne0II+w/egjUgW5W
 1mqdPHvcs0UWAoXnY/qWvQ==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2500 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1oBhyV-0000c6-BJ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:24:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <jwvfsj4al3c.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
 Monnier on Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:13:41 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:292112
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/292112>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  larsi@gnus.org,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:13:41 -0400
> 
> I really think that printing the backtrace right when the error is
> signaled is a bad idea.  Better just copy the whole specpdl (or just the
> backtrace part of it) and leave the buffer manipulation and printing for
> later when we're back in a normal&sane context.

I agree.