From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Supporting stylistic sets Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 11:38:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83h70xnp43.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wn9up0es.fsf@gnu.org> <83illeou0j.fsf@gnu.org> <83r101ntwi.fsf@gnu.org> <83illdnpn3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39486"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?4KS44KSu4KWA4KSwIOCkuOCkv+CkguCkuSBTYW1lZXIgU2luZ2g=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 24 10:40:06 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oc0hg-000A7Q-SP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 10:40:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40288 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oc0hf-0007kr-TR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 04:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oc0gn-0006ke-07 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 04:39:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oc0gm-0000jB-Na; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 04:39:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=8d4QY5JCYTTMkn/wYuR54Dn9BmRhj96kEfFWV6Mb2Hc=; b=eLOtAKn1nZ+8QTJ6ZW+k rjacyRTMul0OI1QXns/P+5Ens4RMRyPvJKqE7uYUPEW+1HIM/gTNzftCza7o1czoPrXSctdk2Kdnb ioPPw97CkC2KzcwlxeYaIV8L7OqX4z6RWasfH2peskHNSz6nAMAYpAM7Qw5v8lTabxez/UOiCWpp1 hitOsFiSXi/PcWeBc3qo4AQwOZjMIGzQ2OOjhjTvcJbjH5n8dtctlQJR/NHZFs3k2kZ3prAJTYrqs DWDw04m66TcoBMd8E577dIVWa4PQ9pIaDmBejTelOEnIMsA2DjkHrQKJIwge+ChlTVaclV+hTA5yD hOEfHUJui1Ftsg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3805 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oc0gl-0002t1-8t; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 04:39:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from =?utf-8?B?4KS44KSu4KWA4KSwIOCkuOCkv+CkguCkuQ==?= Sameer Singh on Sat, 24 Sep 2022 14:04:42 +0530) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296131 Archived-At: > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh > Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 14:04:42 +0530 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Then font-level specification of this would not be as simple as was > originally suggested, I think: the characters were missing from that > suggestion. > > We don't have to specify each character for which we want the stylistic-set, we just simply would have to > pass the tags > and hb_shape_full would take care of the rest. I don't understand: how does this handle the case where a certain character has more than 2 alternative glyphs? which alternative will be selected?