From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs git repo mangled Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 05:26:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83h6ziavf8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v8o0hrk2.fsf@gmx.de> <88f2ba22-64c4-c835-294e-9367766161e5@gmail.com> <87bkprhw7r.fsf@gmx.de> <48c054670f70ff7b056a@heytings.org> <877d0eiywf.fsf@gmx.de> <48c054670f6a015a2cca@heytings.org> <8735b2itq8.fsf@gmx.de> <48c054670f81f5613f23@heytings.org> <87o7tqbiqv.fsf@gmx.de> <48c054670fab42fe2218@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9291"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 02 04:27:26 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oq4PS-00029W-LD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 04:27:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oq4Ox-0004yl-Ai; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:26:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oq4Ow-0004yS-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:26:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oq4Ov-0000WH-I0; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:26:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=h+TsHTjd0BukuXP0bDHDJX19zp1YEYG28wxZExA8FvM=; b=Xu/ianmFmPvX1LEBVbxb c4bn7DF70VaqrAlLLhwc5CI2NKfa8ozPOe4je4hJSkHc5p2zxqmlrF7BrqmKf2cNACDTI/8c2P2yt iVGj5lx5iHU4CSk76fB1BFIQKr/zTozMQ9GwwzamzWiwNV4oVz6fEzgXGpiEaC+DsDD19M2OSh7OF aCWEk0bLzPDZ5V2cVUza8mrxuvptyhIfKJh4GWKtkoqYpFwvRj5heR1IhvyTYzCTF61WI2k1s5lvb ylJJ3Hoiez6jm8A6k9SQdOqnbyPbESHeDgvCs920SF2HflrYf+483WIMxlVv8hodEyg0UpjbnI3Zu Lb1zfQcpwaRQ+A==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oq4Ou-0001pF-FR; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:26:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48c054670fab42fe2218@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Tue, 01 Nov 2022 19:41:41 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298990 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 19:41:41 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: Gerd Möllmann , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Wouldn't his mean that all other commits prior the eglot merge would be > > regarded as "good", when bisecting? I doubt this is what we want. > > > > No, it means that all commits between Eglot's root (1e5b753bf4) and > Eglot's merge (0186faf2a1), except Eglot's merge itself, are regarded as > "good". IOW, git bisect will never "descend" into Eglot's branch, and > only into that branch, which is exactly what we want. IMO, this interpretation should be in the comments inside the script.