From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Consequent CC Mode fix to the release branch or to master? Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:46:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83h6whi4g5.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36219"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 23 17:47:59 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pJzzD-0009Cj-1r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:47:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJzyK-0002ZO-F6; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:47:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJzyG-0002Z5-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJzyF-0007aR-FE; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:46:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=NM9JF1nq0y+1ti6ApgSqGMH3zBI3p9jgO+LgkvGCvWI=; b=fqdxhXdfcHcp Y6LMAMH5fQnb0e3lNMMfLCht+T25OdJjWqIyx1M14yq4c1blXZiSU926HRTGLzvIW/Gnei2B02JAA NfBlnQTbKPKRjQdkwGOE9ib4OZL8DvylZYbSmrBZ58zF95xTYssLjly0HFzKWCalP0YAvstbDfeEP lQypTmdG+IXFejSz58qJRF7kxvHfhk/GedohN7u8WCHaopvcryByP8DYlFsY2lZl8cz7RnWUzc4Ys Vst1F6GxUvWY1dVykv4kXtil8W9WaHjrpTGf0gOtG7oOiKIQHaeUWFAV0qttZY/whF0TOyaA+8Dsc X9zpDbKh000R2XCSRcFeiA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pJzxy-0004XK-Mo; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:46:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Alan Mackenzie on Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:00:49 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:302614 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:00:49 +0000 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Alan Mackenzie > > Hello, Eli. > > Whilst fixing bug #59234 (Inappropriate fontification as a type of > function call NSRectFill), I came across inappropriate handling of > whitespace which leads to the Lisp error "Invalid search bound (wrong > side of point)". This error is likely to occur only rarely, and probably > not in the more used CC Mode modes such as C and C++. > > I now have a patch to fix this. Is it still OK to commit such patches to > the release branch, or would it be preferred to commit it to master? It depends on the patch. Please show it, so I could have an idea of what it entails. > I also have the actual fix to the above mentioned bug, #59234, which I > intend to commit to the release branch, and one other open bug (an > offshoot from bug #58883) which doesn't yet have a completed patch. > > Do you have firm ideas, yet, of when you're going to start the pretest > cycle, such that non-pressing bugs would no longer be wanted in the > release branch? I hope we will have the first pretest in a week or so.