From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 17:28:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83h6oearyl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <97224c4f-fad4-ae01-46c1-5755d97d9a92@gutov.dev> <87fs3ztq38.fsf@localhost> <87cyz3qwba.fsf@posteo.net> <8734zztmiz.fsf@localhost> <87sf7zqs3l.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il8vs6e7.fsf@localhost> <87jztbqrc9.fsf@yahoo.com> <877cpbs5a0.fsf@localhost> <87fs3zqqgj.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jkfs4o0.fsf@localhost> <87y1hroz47.fsf@posteo.net> <83cyz2ctp0.fsf@gnu.org> <87msy6rzeg.fsf@localhost> <83wmxab0ym.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8cuqg8d.fsf@localhost> <83ttseava1.fsf@gnu.org> <50c351cf-4c7b-5497-a561-ba1b9f63d1c8@gutov.dev> <83ledqatmt.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12001"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: yantar92@posteo.net, jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de, philipk@posteo.net, luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 16:29:25 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qc59J-0002r9-4d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 16:29:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc58H-0008Lf-3f; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:28:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc58E-0008Kn-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc58D-0004Ar-P3; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:28:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=BbJW7A2x52oHGS/VHm1DWjF4CbDVroEm45NjIzpSAcw=; b=QQ7bBvn1tuZo rNFn+MAfPKBFMrOYTlwVZqkRXL+xzw4OtRoJYL3IWhX3CZXKJ9Mz6NA9R54x4aEBp/gWGa5Z2kZuR UWSI49i8/SrUe/ZqxG1ktpSZ+QjJaXLxBh27gEYrqJAZLukudnB4HJC2sWcXT7+pXyqw+5y2QP30J EJg6Ms53QtURAEksExI72IpPy7tzCAnPaKxRR3xH7BqIhIFc0bw1Q1zmduhviy7wrfQAf8fIX31aL SYHDnnD/Cib6R7x0hSruuR0/v0GpaK3pFCcWd3AKGhfzlJO5TgLAI3AQ9jE485fGnXL+kkOoc3+2v Z7bEK2/UkxZyhG8KcXNMLA==; In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 1 Sep 2023 17:21:50 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309805 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 17:21:50 +0300 > Cc: yantar92@posteo.net, jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de, philipk@posteo.net, > luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 01/09/2023 16:51, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 16:44:35 +0300 > >> Cc:jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de,philipk@posteo.net,luangruo@yahoo.com, > >> stefankangas@gmail.com,emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> From: Dmitry Gutov > >> > >> On 01/09/2023 16:16, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>>> I can turn them off selectively in my MUA. > >>>> IMHO, this is not any different from how I approach mailing lists - most > >>>> of the discussions on ML are not interesting to me and I simply filter > >>>> them out. I think Gnus scoring is relevant (although I use different > >>>> approach). > >>> How is this consistent with complaints about the difficulties of using > >>> a MUA in sophisticated ways? > >> Very consistent: people who find using a MUA in complex ways difficult > >> don't set up additional filtering and usually don't complain about it > >> (the default volume of notifications usually seems fine for me, for > >> example). > >> > >> What's odd is when people who know how to set up MUA filters and > >> everything produce such complaints. > > Such responses make me wish I never participated in this discussion. > > No need to be rude. Yes, of course: everyone else is rude, just not yourself. Even when you are. > You judged some other people's workflows by your own standards I haven't judged anyone. I provided what I thought was a useful feedback about some workflows. If that's not useful, feel free to ignore. Refraining from response is orders of magnitude more polite than posting innuendo about my alleged inability to use my MUA.