From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66743: 30.0.50; Crash when dumping reftex Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:01:32 +0300 Message-ID: <83h6mce3cj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875y2v592c.fsf@localhost> <83a5s6kgxx.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmvadfkw.fsf@localhost> <87cyx1d91n.fsf@localhost> <871qdhd2dh.fsf@localhost> <835y2th9gn.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttqdbmy7.fsf@localhost> <831qdhh6vd.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7glbk6w.fsf@localhost> <83wmv9frp1.fsf@gnu.org> <87il6tbjkp.fsf@localhost> <83sf5xfr7u.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyx1bikg.fsf@localhost> <83pm11fko1.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttqccu19.fsf@localhost> <83r0lge4ea.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7gkcp1y.fsf@localhost> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20402"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, 66743@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 27 13:03:47 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKd1-00054K-It for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:03:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKci-00052Q-GV; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:03:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKcN-00050P-8l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKbm-0001C4-Eh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:02:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKcH-0006BW-Nn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66743 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 66743-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66743.169840452223687 (code B ref 66743); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66743) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2023 11:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35244 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKbJ-00069z-Pt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59488) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKbI-00069T-1K for 66743@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:02:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwKah-0000mZ-B9; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:01:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=0oiSSJNT3BwM1R1cL8KdHa7ZMGS8BMtO0w0MIDbjrM8=; b=NLcaruV7/JFC QiKhUACto8IKeCZ1cKR/IGfCoR6ymdmyn2eFRJe9EgLuAd6FaEnmmVmBBFRozT1HsUDIZqM8PAp76 KGkzvMAZRH7Evt9X7lsDClRBXc4qt/nt+MmFrMVQsALfhQTT5bveUYeQtza1EaiFHtXM8pTy38uzS FqVIs5wopQmBRV8mtNv4uWbd29qZk14TR7p7QUKQencgkalMbkyPO9jGYIXoSplHR4laBZ07sGskK ag/F69cj/4Hzr7gcNWZjfwwnfEgvQvqdGGr/o3VZyhpMUI2GDOJwANRb9Hvf461Q+pghDQea7kb4O oBiCaVs1dI3c4hyVxHVwuA==; In-Reply-To: <87o7gkcp1y.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:55:37 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:273372 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, 66743@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:55:37 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> If `error' does all the necessary cleanup, `emacs_abort' is indeed not > >> necessary. But that's not very obvious from the source code. > > > > What cleanup is needed in this case? > > I have no idea. > To be clear: I am not sure what is the difference between `emacs_abort' > and `error'. AFAIU, in batch mode there's no difference, since calling 'error' shows a backtrace and exits. > If you say that using `error' instead of `emacs_abort' is safe, I will > just follow. I expect that you know these details well. I think it's safe, since we already do that in other places in pdumper.c.