From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sending attachments Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:25:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83fxd3rmph.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k52rzyn1.fsf@benthic.rattlesnake.com> <873a9fw6dt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87y6r7yp1y.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877hyp3by2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r5wvdw57.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <833a991sf6.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6r1yy63.fsf@gnu.org> <83ws6kz4o9.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247343962 14369 80.91.229.12 (11 Jul 2009 20:26:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 11 22:25:55 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MPj8s-000574-R0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:25:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39298 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPj8s-0003FN-3g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:25:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPj8m-0003DE-0x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:25:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPj8l-0003CQ-Bw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:25:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52193 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPj8l-0003C5-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:25:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il ([84.95.2.10]:42343 helo=mtaout3.012.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MPj8k-0003cf-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:25:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KMM00E00WQ3QQ00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:25:45 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.249.41]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KMM00A90WQWOAG0@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:25:45 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112355 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Miles Bader , cyd@stupidchicken.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:50:59 -0400 > > > My gray hair says there ain't no such thing. If it's more powerful > > and sophisticated, there's some price to pay. > > So your argument is hypothetical, rather than based on concrete > problems. Not hypothetical, based on experience. > To me that counts as "one vote to make mail-mode obsolete". Yes, I used to hold such naive ideas as well: that an argument isn't valid unless it is based on provable facts. I'm much better now, thank you.