From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!) Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:15:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83fxc0lupm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r5vklx9x.fsf@gnu.org> <83iqgwlvak.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249841752 12743 80.91.229.12 (9 Aug 2009 18:15:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xah@xahlee.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 09 20:15:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MaCvo-0007ri-UT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:15:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45869 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaCvo-00087q-7R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaCvh-00085u-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:15:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaCvg-00084p-4F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:15:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38619 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaCvf-00084d-Tx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:15:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il ([84.95.2.1]:65083) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaCvf-0007YN-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:15:35 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KO400700FQEOE00@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:15:34 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.224.142]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KO4001JTG1XA5E0@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:15:33 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113869 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:10:41 +0200 > From: Lennart Borgman > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, xah@xahlee.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > So you are saying that subgroups are bad because they do not give you > enough structure? I'm saying that subgroups called "advanced" are bad.