From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: AUTO_COMPOSED_PROP_IDX unused? Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:28:16 +0200 Message-ID: <83fx7ymotr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83hbsemx26.fsf@gnu.org> <87skbyii7j.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259436674 30390 80.91.229.12 (28 Nov 2009 19:31:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 28 20:31:07 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NET0d-0003Gf-1O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:31:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38987 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NET0c-0000ig-Ex for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:31:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NET0W-0000f6-Qc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:31:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NET0R-0000bx-3J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:30:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46504 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NET0Q-0000bb-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:30:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:55101) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NET0Q-0001hZ-JD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:30:54 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KTU00E003691Y00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:30:18 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.202.132]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KTU00BBF3IHG470@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:30:18 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87skbyii7j.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117911 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Cc: Kenichi Handa , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:04:48 -0500 > > > OK to delete AUTO_COMPOSED_PROP_IDX from the enumeration? > > I'm not sure it's safe. Did you see any evidence that it might be unsafe, or is that just general precaution? Suppose Handa-san tells us that it indeed was introduced for the previous implementation of automatic compositions and was supposed to be deleted when we switched to the current implementation -- will you still want to wait until after v23.2 then?