From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU Emacs is on Bazaar now. Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:02:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83fx6teegw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d4206n80.fsf@canonical.com> <83tyvaewjg.fsf@gnu.org> <87my11o9fk.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262116976 17341 80.91.229.12 (29 Dec 2009 20:02:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 29 21:02:47 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPiEX-0006dN-D5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:59:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60668 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPiEX-0005Qt-Or for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:59:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPiES-0005Ps-D4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:59:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPiEM-0005ND-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:59:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45520 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPiEL-0005NA-Uk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:59:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:35403) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPiEL-0004cX-Jy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:59:45 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KVF00K00J1ILJ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:59:44 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.222.44]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KVF00J8EJJJO140@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:59:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87my11o9fk.fsf@telefonica.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118968 Archived-At: > From: =C3=93scar_Fuentes > Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:40:47 +0100 >=20 > James Cloos writes: >=20 > > On a 64-bit box (Linux kernel, GNU userland) the initial branch c= aused > > the python process to boloon to over two gigs of vm, most kept re= sident. >=20 > What version are you using? For me, it required approx 1 GB on a 64= bit > GNU/Linux machine. (bzr 2.0.1, python 2.6.4, http) I didn't measure, but didn't see any problems that would hint the box was thrashing. > > How painful is it to grab an additional branch from the main repo= over > > sftp, comared to the grab of trunk? Ie, did the initial branch g= rab > > just the history of trunk, or di it grab the hsitory of all of th= e > > branches? >=20 > Grabbing and additional branch requires a fraction of the cost of t= he > initial branch. Bzr will transfer only the missing revisions. IIRC = it > required 22 minutes for the initial branch (trunk) and 4 minutes fo= r > multi-tty. It was 15 minutes and less than 1, respectively, for me.