From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug statistics Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:27:38 +0300 Message-ID: <83fx0be7ad.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1focf1eb1p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <874ogsthn2.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277493043 30294 80.91.229.12 (25 Jun 2010 19:10:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:10:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 25 21:10:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSEIQ-0007ag-7i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:10:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46000 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSEIP-00027X-1u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:10:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44113 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSD4d-00026K-2y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:52:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS6GF-0002QF-Rd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:35:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:60306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS6GA-0002ON-QO; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:35:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L4K00300FPNTB00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:29:37 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.155.52]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L4K001KHFTBQC50@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:29:37 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126391 Archived-At: > From: Dan Nicolaescu > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:28:19 -0400 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > IMO the main problem is man power. 100% agreement. Someone(TM) should check whether the switch to Bazaar made the number and rate of contributions from non-core developers higher. If not, we should look for ways to attract more contributors, because the current resources of manpower are evidently not large enough.