From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7651: 23.2.91; Rmail doesn't allow displaying text attachments conveniently Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:26:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83fwtcprv3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293897239 26802 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2011 15:53:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 15:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org To: handa@m17n.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 01 16:53:54 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ3mD-0001bn-GL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 16:53:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52067 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZ3mC-0007XX-LL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:53:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59091 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZ3m2-0007Wc-Rq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:53:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ3lx-0006dT-7i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:53:42 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ3lx-0006dN-4W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:53:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ3DW-0007PV-Do; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:18:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 15:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7651 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7651-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7651.129389506628463 (code B ref 7651); Sat, 01 Jan 2011 15:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7651) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2011 15:17:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ3DG-0007P2-1H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:17:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ3DC-0007On-BK for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:17:44 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LEC00K00NWFI300@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 7651@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:24:31 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.127.157]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LEC00JMYO4TRMA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:24:31 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <83vd28q46b.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:18:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42978 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:00:44 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 7651@debbugs.gnu.org > > Thanks. I just started using it. It is much better now. I have only > a couple of minor issues to report so far: Here's one more problem, a more serious one. The message reproduced below, posted today to emacs-devel, is by default displayed with no body at all for the 1st part, like this (indentation added): From: David Kuehling To: Ken Raeburn Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 15:20:58 +0100 Cc: rms@gnu.org, Emacs Dev Subject: Re: Some OpenWrt port related problems [1:multipart/signed] [2:application/pgp-signature file:noname (189B)] I guess we need to handle parts with no Content-Type at all? Here's the original message, copied from the RMAIL buffer after toggling the display with `v' (again, indentation added): From emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 01 09:21:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: eliz@gnu.org Delivery-date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50257) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ2Ko-0003mt-2D for eliz@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ2Kq-00016f-DO for eliz@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:33 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_MIME_NO_TEXT autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:57125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ2Kp-00016U-KE for eliz@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:31 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54155 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZ2Kp-0005ny-FW for eliz@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:31 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33845 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZ2KU-0005ns-Ld for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ2KS-0000ys-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:10 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:56759 helo=mail.gmx.net) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ2KS-0000yf-CX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:21:08 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jan 2011 14:21:05 -0000 Received: from g225041162.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO snail.gmx.de) [92.225.41.162] by mail.gmx.net (mp045) with SMTP; 01 Jan 2011 15:21:05 +0100 X-Authenticated: #4121607 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1//MpsRJHX/GjPLea+HpHz6pI07dsTdZCK9rl/RiR Tae4tRtlRKjlu2 From: David Kuehling To: Ken Raeburn References: <87sjxi5hko.fsf@snail.Pool> <87lj39y52n.fsf@snail.Pool> <87pqsl7wt7.fsf@snail.Pool> <66798668-5808-473B-BF11-DF4DBA5464A1@raeburn.org> Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 15:20:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <66798668-5808-473B-BF11-DF4DBA5464A1@raeburn.org> (Ken Raeburn's message of "Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:08:09 -0500") Message-ID: <8739pc9039.fsf@snail.Pool> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Cc: rms@gnu.org, Emacs Dev Subject: Re: Some OpenWrt port related problems X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES: -------- --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> "Ken" =3D=3D Ken Raeburn writes: > On Dec 29, 2010, at 04:28, David Kuehling wrote: >> I could dump Emacs in the target system, from a wrapper script, when >> launched for the first time. But last time I tried that it failed >> with insufficient memory (32Mb RAM, no swap), so I'm going without >> dumping for now. > It sounds like running Emacs on such a system is going to be pretty > marginal in any case, but do you recall what part of it failed? > Finding the doc strings? The actual dumping? Ok, just recompiled emacs with dumping support, and running $ emacs -Q --batch --eval \ '(dump-emacs "./demacs" "/usr/bin/emacs")' on the NanoNote gave me: [..] Loading ediff-hook... Finding pointers to doc strings... Finding pointers to doc strings...done emacs: Can't allocate buffer for /usr/bin/emacs So it wants to pull a full copy of the emacs binary into memory? This problem I can workaround by changing the Linux overcommit setting, but then dumping fails with another problem: $ echo "1" > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory=20 $ emacs -Q --batch --eval \ '(dump-emacs "./demacs" "/usr/bin/emacs")' [..] Finding pointers to doc strings... Finding pointers to doc strings...done emacs: Program segment above .bss in /usr/bin/emacs So what's that supposed to mean?=20=20 cheers, David =2D-=20 GnuPG public key: http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~dvdkhlng/dk.gpg Fingerprint: B17A DC95 D293 657B 4205 D016 7DEF 5323 C174 7D40 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNHzhLfe9TI8F0fUARAhyyAJ99DqcDST7T2KZEGeVc4zPusaHEQQCeM1wi xMZrhKQbr3HKWCBWKQGiI4o= =YpG9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--