From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10783: Some built-in functionslost their argument names Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:02:45 +0200 Message-ID: <83fwegzoka.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3tfwei753u.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8339ah1yek.fsf@gnu.org> <8qzkcpj8oi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329019428 7268 80.91.229.3 (12 Feb 2012 04:03:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10783@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 12 05:03:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RwQf8-0003lS-TA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:03:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwQf8-00015i-DI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:03:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwQf6-00015d-DF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:03:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwQf5-00028P-JQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:03:40 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwQf5-00028L-GW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:03:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RwQgP-0001zQ-Mt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:05:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10783 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10783-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10783.13290194567590 (code B ref 10783); Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10783) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2012 04:04:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36638 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RwQfg-0001yN-5S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:04:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:53284) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RwQfe-0001yA-PE for 10783@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:04:15 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LZ900I00HTY5M00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 10783@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:02:45 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.150.51]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LZ900IF7HWK4U10@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:02:45 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <8qzkcpj8oi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56823 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, 10783@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:40:13 -0500 > > I was also thinking that there would not be many users of the MS-DOS > build wanting to look at the doc of the x-* functions I don't understand how this would be TRT. The MS-DOS build of Emacs supports the clipboard, so these functions are there not just for beauty. > Eg there are already many compat x-* functions without docs in > pc-win.el. They all lack a doc string in their X versions as well, AFAICS. > I wonder if it helps if to also add the "(fn ..." part to the end of > the pc-win.el doc strings? Sorry, I don't follow. Can you give an example?