From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11178: 24.0.94; Elisp manual: add index entries for :link LINK-DATA alternatives Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:13:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83fwca660h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <71CD8ACB1F8549BB8F56C20C42ECEB10@us.oracle.com> <87fwcaeqpq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334132175 3811 80.91.229.3 (11 Apr 2012 08:16:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11178@debbugs.gnu.org, cyd@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 11 10:16:13 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHsio-00073E-FJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:16:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55664 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHsin-0007eS-P9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHsih-0007d9-Kd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:16:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHsib-0000ss-BB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHsib-0000sm-64 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHsje-0007Ao-Eb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11178 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 11178-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11178.133413216227497 (code B ref 11178); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11178) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2012 08:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50311 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHsif-00079S-QJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:53586) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHsie-000794-8M for 11178@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M2B005002QME000@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 11178@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:14:52 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.57.204]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M2B005YH2WR6LW1@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:14:52 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58762 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:27:43 -0700 > Cc: 11178@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > (elisp) Common Keywords should be indexed for each of the LINK-DATA > > > alternatives: `custom-manual', `info-link', `url-link', > > > `emacs-commentary-link', `emacs-library-link', `file-link', > > > `function-link', `variable-link', and `custom-group-link'. > > > > No. That makes no sense---there's already an index entry for adding > > links to custom docs. I don't want to pollute the index with entries > > listing every possible value for what's just a keyword. (Though I > > eagerly await the coming long-form article arguing against this.) > > These are reference entries. No different from indexing individual function > names or individual button properties. Perhaps adding two more index entries, something like @cindex links to documentation for customization items @cindex customization items, links to documentation would do the job. Currently, I see only one index entry there: @kindex link@r{, customization keyword} which IMO is not enough for when the reader wants to find information about adding links to the docs. The existing index entry only covers efficiently the case when the reader is specifically looking for the 'link' keyword and already knows what that's used for.