From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12829: 24.3.50; emacs_abort () called from w32proc.c:1128 Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:09:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83fw4hxwvk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <509E76A7.5070309@optusnet.com.au> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352563858 10323 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2012 16:10:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 12829@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stephen Powell Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 10 17:11:08 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TXDeE-0000Kx-JH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:11:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60900 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXDe5-0004BF-4i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:10:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35348) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXDe0-0004AG-9t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:10:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXDdx-0007Gk-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:10:52 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXDdw-0007Gf-V2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:10:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXDeA-0001Bj-7V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12829 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12829-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12829.13525638444545 (code B ref 12829); Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12829) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2012 16:10:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59699 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXDdr-0001BE-I0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:10:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:53837) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXDdp-0001B6-7b for 12829@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:10:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MDA00C004RK2T00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12829@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:09:43 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MDA00B4S4W6YW30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:09:42 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <509E76A7.5070309@optusnet.com.au> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66728 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:45:43 +0000 > From: Stephen Powell > > Start emacs, `M-x gnus', `RET' to select the first group, and then `SPC' > and `n' to page through messages. Read about 20 before the crash. OK, thanks. I think everything is clear now: this crash happens with 50% probability whenever there's more than one async subprocesses monitored at the same time. I think the changes I posted should fix that. If not, let me know what happens, and I will take it from there.