From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13935: 24.3.50; `fullscreen' frame parameter is wrong, on MS Windows at least Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:34:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83fvzm4fys.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3B679DF7B809403FBE6F1593250D1D1A@us.oracle.com> <83fw00joom.fsf@gnu.org> <837gl95akv.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364031307 30907 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2013 09:35:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 09:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13935-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 23 10:35:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UJKrN-0003zZ-Er for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:35:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50744 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJKqz-0001Ys-Mt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 05:35:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56341) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJKqv-0001WF-Mv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 05:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJKqu-0001W4-LC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 05:35:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJKqu-0001Uu-GU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 05:35:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJKsr-0004ZW-6J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 05:37:05 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 09:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 13935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 13935@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Original-Received: via spool by 13935-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D13935.136403139617538 (code D ref 13935); Sat, 23 Mar 2013 09:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13935-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2013 09:36:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41557 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJKsN-0004Yo-SC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 05:36:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:49320) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJKsM-0004Yh-9D for 13935-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 05:36:35 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MK300H00X2E0000@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 13935-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:34:31 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MK300G73X9JUT90@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:34:31 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <837gl95akv.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:72820 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:30:40 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 13935@debbugs.gnu.org > > I'd like to change the manual text to say the following (only the last > sentence was modified). Can someone (Jan?) please verify that this is > reasonably correct for all the window managers we support? If not, > what needs to be changed in the wording of the last sentence? > > Specify that width, height or both shall be maximized. The value > @code{fullwidth} specifies that width shall be as wide as possible. > The value @code{fullheight} specifies that height shall be as tall as > possible. The value @code{fullboth} specifies that both the width and > the height shall be set to the size of the screen. The value > @code{maximized} specifies that the frame shall be maximized. The > difference between @code{maximized} and @code{fullboth} is that the > former can still be resized by dragging window manager decorations > with the mouse, while the latter really covers the whole screen and > does not allow resizing by mouse dragging. > > Thanks. No comments, so I committed the above as trunk revision 112115, and I'm closing the bug report.