From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Trunk still not open Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:23:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83fvmlcc4h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6xwqfxhl88.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83txb1mcsy.fsf@gnu.org> <87siqlku0i.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <878usdgm1e.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83fvmlm7r8.fsf@gnu.org> <874n31gks2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394792626 20113 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2014 10:23:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 14 11:23:54 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WOPHN-00036e-6U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:23:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43829 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOPHM-0006in-PR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:23:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOPHF-0006ig-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:23:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOPH9-0004bx-4w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:23:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:59672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOPH2-0004ZX-Ph; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:23:32 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N2F009008656300@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:23:32 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N2F00C2P8V77T00@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:23:32 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <874n31gks2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170348 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:02:53 +0100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: David Kastrup > >> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:35:41 +0100 > >> > >> Well, one could push them to an "undocumented" branch. That one gets > >> rebased from time to time on the trunk, so any commit from there that > >> has made it with documentation into the trunk will no longer be in there > >> after rebasing. > > > > This could also work, but IMO this alternative is more complicated > > than the other one, and also has the disadvantage that changes appear > > on the trunk with delay, which some users might not like. > > Well, that's the point. A state that isn't an annoyance to anybody is > not likely to change. Annoyance might also lead to unwanted consequences, like rebellion.