From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16853: 24.3.50; ert-run-tests-interactively difficult to abort Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:30:17 +0300 Message-ID: <83fvg0c45y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <540CB7F2.3060905@easy-emacs.de> <540D76FB.7030708@easy-emacs.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410269495 4612 80.91.229.3 (9 Sep 2014 13:31:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 13:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16853@debbugs.gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 09 15:31:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XRLW0-0000hz-Ns for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:31:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49789 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRLW0-0002DM-B5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:31:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRLVp-00022X-Fg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:31:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRLVg-0002sU-16 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:31:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43003) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRLVf-0002sQ-MI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRLVe-00025b-Gc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 13:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16853 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 16853-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16853.14102694227973 (code B ref 16853); Tue, 09 Sep 2014 13:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16853) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2014 13:30:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34567 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRLUz-00024V-44 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:30:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:48349) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRLUs-000248-2S for 16853@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:30:16 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NBM00L00YOHBB00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 16853@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:30:07 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NBM00L18YU7AK20@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:30:07 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93183 Archived-At: > From: Helmut Eller > Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 16:02:53 +0200 > > Try this: > emacs -batch -eval '(message "%s" (pos-visible-in-window-p (window-start)))' > > It prints nil. Shouldn't window-start always be visible? No, not when the window is not "live".