From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:41:04 +0300 Message-ID: <83fv8nyzpb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86egoeusg2.fsf@example.com> <87384qzxqy.fsf@igel.home> <87h9t4kcaq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83pp7rzvq8.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnjbk7cj.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83h9t3zmef.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8yvjokg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427683314 18323 80.91.229.3 (30 Mar 2015 02:41:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 02:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sva-news@mygooglest.com, schwab@suse.de, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 30 04:41:47 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YcPe5-0006Sb-Di for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 04:41:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59034 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcPe4-0006j6-NQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:41:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46101) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcPdk-0006hR-Vj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:41:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcPdh-00036n-Kj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:41:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:35122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcPdh-00036Y-D2; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:41:21 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NM0007006YDKY00@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:36:08 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NM00060W788MN20@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:36:08 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87a8yvjokg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184534 Archived-At: > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Cc: rms@gnu.org, > sva-news@mygooglest.com, > schwab@suse.de, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:50:39 +0900 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > You said, repeatedly, that the original instructions didn't use a > > bound branch, but instead described a "truly distributed workflow". > > That's factually incorrect. > > The latter part of the first sentence still is true; the workflow we > described was truly distributed. That description survived mostly with no changes to this day, so if it described a distributed workflow, it still does. Nothing's changed. Therefore, saying that you needed to give up the distributed workflow due to complaints is inconsistent with the facts. > That you lump them together in one statement as "factually > incorrect" suggests that you really don't understand what you're > talking about. I think the problem is that you misunderstood what I was saying.