From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 11:12:31 +0300 Message-ID: <83fv6fx0nk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <83twv31jzg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> <83bnh7z8c5.fsf@gnu.org> <5564C2C7.5050909@yandex.ru> <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> <55650812.60909@yandex.ru> <831ti2yu1a.fsf@gnu.org> <5565E28A.5040507@yandex.ru> <83wpzuxbtd.fsf@gnu.org> <5565E8AB.5020107@yandex.ru> <83r3q2xa3q.fsf@gnu.org> <5566583F.7020503@yandex.ru> <83h9qxxvo4.fsf@gnu.org> <5566EC49.8010907@yandex.ru> <837frsycly.fsf@gnu.org> <5567351E.7020006@yandex.ru> <83zj4owthp.fsf@gnu.org> <5567AE52.1000600@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432887203 22235 80.91.229.3 (29 May 2015 08:13:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 08:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 29 10:13:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YyFPj-00022j-Vn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 10:13:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34265 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YyFPj-0000iU-AM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 04:13:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YyFPe-0000en-8W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 04:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YyFPa-0008Iu-R8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 04:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YyFPa-0008In-Nz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 04:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyFPa-0002sj-8m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 04:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 08:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.143288716511051 (code B ref 20629); Fri, 29 May 2015 08:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2015 08:12:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60035 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyFPI-0002sB-TI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 04:12:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:58983) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyFPF-0002rw-Vs for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 04:12:42 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NP300L00QNAEE00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2015 11:12:35 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NP300LZ6QSZEC00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 29 May 2015 11:12:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <5567AE52.1000600@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103293 Archived-At: > Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 03:09:54 +0300 > > On 05/28/2015 07:34 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > But having just qualified tags is bad for accuracy, right? > > Maybe. Depends on things we would add to the Lisp code. Can you elaborate? Is there a way to get the same accuracy and completion without having both qualified and unqualified tags? > > So do we have a decision here? > > If you want my opinion (please keep in mind: not an etags user), > following in Exuberant Ctags's footsteps sounds best. Nobody ever got > fired for doing that. Yes, but I think if we change etags to create duplicate tags, we should have this feature opt-out, unlike Exuberant, otherwise TAGS created by default will be deficient with xref. Do you agree?