From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Which version of Texinfo do we require? Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:43:33 +0200 Message-ID: <83fv005x62.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448045050 404 80.91.229.3 (20 Nov 2015 18:44:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 20 19:43:59 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzqf5-0001F0-A1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 19:43:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49327 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzqf4-0004IU-Qd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:43:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzqf0-0004IM-VN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:43:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzqex-0003Zp-Q2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:43:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:57886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzqex-0003ZS-IM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:43:47 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NY400L00MBP1C00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:43:46 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NY400KZBMOXP380@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:43:46 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194877 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:14:54 -0800 >=20 > I tried building elisp.pdf in emacs-25, and the build failed on lin= e 560 of > frames.texi: >=20 > @itemize @w >=20 > Changing it to "@w{}" causes the build to go through. I'm using tex= info 6.0. > The docs say: >=20 > "If you don=E2=80=99t specify a mark command, the default is @bul= let. If you don=E2=80=99t > want any mark at all, but still want logical items, use @w{} (in = this case > the braces are required)." >=20 > In this a bug, or is it my version of Texinfo? It was a mistake in the Texinfo source. @w requires braces (confusing, I know, because @bullet doesn't).