From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More over-engineering Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:34:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83fuzqozf8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83si3rqp96.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3jbqluj.fsf@gnu.org> <83io4mr27s.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448728524 21248 80.91.229.3 (28 Nov 2015 16:35:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 16:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 28 17:35:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a2iSs-0007DP-EE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 17:35:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33007 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2iSv-0001rE-Ta for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:35:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2iSo-0001gK-4p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:35:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2iSk-0006OW-Vc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:35:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:36840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2iSk-0006NC-O9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYJ00E009ECYI00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:27:49 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYJ00B9U9QD9O40@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:27:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195466 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:22:01 -0500 > > >> >> How 'bout the other question: what happens if we don't use that macro? > >> > I assumed that question was rhetorical. > >> No, I'm really curious why all functions need to do that. > > Because they want to catch all non-local exits. Those macros are the > > implementation of what was discussed in the other thread all over. > > So it is not protecting something inside those functions, but rather > just trying to hide the non-local exits from the caller? Not hide, intercept them and prevent them.