From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22107: 25.1; Wrong docstring for this-single-command-keys Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:49:23 +0200 Message-ID: <83fuza9m18.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h9jt3o66.fsf@gmail.com> <838u54dgg2.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvtkb882.fsf@gnu.org> <83io47blbq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449773425 8394 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2015 18:50:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22107@debbugs.gnu.org, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 19:50:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a76I6-0000VV-8J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:50:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43944 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76I5-0003nB-MG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:50:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42331) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76I1-0003lK-Tj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Hx-0004UR-SP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:50:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Hx-0004UN-Qe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:50:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Hx-0005eO-H3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:50:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22107 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22107-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22107.144977339421704 (code B ref 22107); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22107) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2015 18:49:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39448 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Hq-0005e0-HO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:49:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:36162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Ho-0005dm-IN for 22107@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:49:53 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NZ500H00NUSVD00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 22107@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:49:19 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NZ500H22OA6PU70@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:49:19 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109845 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, rgm@gnu.org, 22107@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:34:48 -0500 > > > So how about saying a few words about the meaning of the return value > > of internal-echo-keystrokes-prefix? I think it's important enough to > > have that at least documented in comments. > > It's used as a proxy for "we're in the middle of a command-with-prefix, When it returns non-nil, I presume? > which may be using the `prefix-arg' variable or any other variable". But this means we can never be sure a non-nil value actually mean the user typed a prefix-arg command, is that true? Do we want to treat the "other" prefixes (which ones, btw?) as prefix-arg in this case?