From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Help writing a patch to allow transparent backgrounds? Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 21:23:04 +0200 Message-ID: <83fux09xpj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56BA043E.1050305@gmail.com> <83lh6s9zx9.fsf@gnu.org> <56BB8570.6040607@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455132213 17036 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2016 19:23:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 10 20:23:27 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aTaMG-0002vk-O1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 20:23:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42315 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTaMG-0000EY-2Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:23:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49903) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTaMC-0000DG-2b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:23:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTaM8-0007Yc-N3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:23:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTaM8-0007YY-He; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:23:16 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2993 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aTaM7-0005sg-7N; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:23:15 -0500 In-reply-to: <56BB8570.6040607@gmail.com> (message from =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9?= =?utf-8?Q?ment?= Pit--Claudel on Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:46:08 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199717 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Clément Pit--Claudel > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:46:08 -0500 > > > Let me know if doing that in a build without Cairo is useful enough > > for you to work on that. > > Yes, I think so :) Am I correct in thinking that the default build does not use Cairo? That is, the final result would work with the default build on Linux, but not with ./configure --with-cairo? Yes, that's correct. Cairo is opt-in at this stage.