From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22683: 25.1.50; auto-composition-mode Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:54:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83fuwrun7x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83twl9wy6e.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455738922 19852 80.91.229.3 (17 Feb 2016 19:55:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22683@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 17 20:55:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8Bp-000792-Rf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:55:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32843 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8Bp-0001xh-2k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:55:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8Bl-0001w2-Gz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8Bi-0005pC-A4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:55:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34623) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8Bi-0005p8-7C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8Bh-0001RZ-Ua for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:55:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22683 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22683-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22683.14557388685505 (code B ref 22683); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22683) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2016 19:54:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59983 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8BA-0001Qj-MG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:54:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8B9-0001QY-U3 for 22683@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:54:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8B1-0005lu-PP for 22683@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8B1-0005lq-M3 for 22683@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:54:19 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4865 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aW8Au-0001TR-8Q; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:54:12 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:47:07 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113206 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: 22683@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:47:07 -0500 > > The words > > > If called from Lisp, > > > enable the mode if ARG is omitted or nil. > > seem to mean, "If the arg is omitted or nil, enable the mode; > otherwise disable it." I was surprised by the actual behavior. Yes, the text is ambiguous. > Does that text come from a macro? No, it comes from the call to define-minor-mode. Problem is, this is a standard wording we have in more than 200 modes in Emacs. If we want to change that, we need to change all of them.