From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Asynchronous DNS Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:23:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83fuwln76x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83io27ytu3.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2mmzkry.fsf@gnus.org> <83k2mlyet8.fsf@gnu.org> <87lh71nriy.fsf@gnus.org> <8637t8opla.fsf@realize.ch> <871t8skg6c.fsf@gnus.org> <86y4b0n5q2.fsf@realize.ch> <87fux7gb7o.fsf@gnus.org> <83wpqjvd2f.fsf@gnu.org> <87zivfobn4.fsf@gnus.org> <86y4ao5g1c.fsf@realize.ch> <87r3ggdo9f.fsf@gnus.org> <86twlb5yl4.fsf@realize.ch> <83d1rzz1mu.fsf@gnu.org> <86egcc49qu.fsf@realize.ch> <87io1k41cg.fsf@gnus.org> <86a8mv41s5.fsf@realize.ch> <8660xj40ky.fsf@realize.ch> <87r3g6iybb.fsf@gnus.org> <87bn7ahiit.fsf@gnus.org> <86povp3nbk.fsf@realize.ch> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456086268 17862 80.91.229.3 (21 Feb 2016 20:24:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 20:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alain Schneble Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 21 21:24:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aXaYI-0003CW-5h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 21:24:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43883 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXaYH-00075l-GE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:24:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58181) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXaY3-00073a-ST for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:24:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXaXy-0007zW-QQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:24:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXaXy-0007zS-Mu; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4337 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aXaXx-00066D-BA; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 15:24:01 -0500 In-reply-to: <86povp3nbk.fsf@realize.ch> (message from Alain Schneble on Sun, 21 Feb 2016 19:55:43 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200402 Archived-At: > From: Alain Schneble > Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 19:55:43 +0100 > > - Shouldn't the printf statements -- that were used for debugging > purposes -- be removed before merging to master? See also attached > patch below. Yes, of course. > - Would it be worth to mention somewhere, that some of the functions may > block also for :nowait t when called outside of the sentinel callback > (and in case the connection has not yet been established)? This should be in the doc string. > Or that > they in turn should be called within the sentinel to get max > asynchronous behavior in any case? For example, we could add a > sentence to make-network-process in the description of :nowait param. This should be in the manual, I think. Thanks.